Let's talk about your GxP evidence review workflow.
Book a workflow review, request a sample review, or talk through how XceptionIQ supports mixed GxP evidence packages.
How we can help
Sign in to the XceptionIQ platform to continue reviewing evidence packages and candidate findings.
Sign InCommon questions
How does XceptionIQ support validation activities?
XceptionIQ is designed to support validation and controlled deployment work. We can discuss documentation, rule traceability, versioned model usage, and review-history controls in the context of your intended use and validation approach.
What evidence formats can we start with?
Most teams start with uploaded PDFs, spreadsheets, CSV exports, scanned forms, SOPs, workflow exports, calibration records, and role or training data.
Do we need integrations before we can evaluate fit?
No. XceptionIQ is designed to start with upload-based review. Integrations become useful when recurring volume makes repeated intake a bottleneck.
Can we configure checks around our own SOPs?
Yes. The goal is to align candidate findings and required evidence checks to your review procedures, expected sequencing, authorization rules, and document requirements.
Does AI make the final compliance decision?
Never. XceptionIQ surfaces candidate findings with evidence and rationale. Human reviewers remain responsible for disposition, approval, and any compliance determination.
Where do audit trails fit in the product?
Audit trails remain an important source of evidence and often the starting point. XceptionIQ broadens the review by connecting them to the surrounding forms, workflow records, roles, training, calibration, and report context needed for QA decisions.